Image of the Week

Our series examining an Image of the Week from the photographic files, by Kevin Warstadt, Edward Connery Lathem ’51 Digital Library Fellow.

Filming of Way Down East ca 1920

Above is a photo from a folder titled Way Down East (Film). Way Down East is a 1920 silent film, directed by D.W. Griffith and starring Lillian Gish. The climax of the film features a rescue on an icy river, filmed in White River Junction. In this photo, Gish can be seen lying on an ice floe out on the river.

Gish was one of the biggest stars of the silent era, playing in films like the controversial Birth of a Nation and the much lauded Broken Blossoms.  Supposedly, Gish’s hand was badly injured from submersion in the freezing water in this scene, and she had reduced mobility in the hand for the rest of her life.

See more photos from the production of Way Down East here.

Image of the Week

Our series examining an Image of the Week from the photographic files, by Kevin Warstadt, Edward Connery Lathem ’51 Digital Library Fellow.

Star Island ca 1891

Pictured above is Star Island from a folder titled “Isle of Shoals.” It is one of ten islands that make up the Isles of Shoals. These islands were once used for seasonal fishing camps by indigenous Americans, but were settled by Europeans in the early 1600s. Star Island now acts as a religious and educational conference center. See the image at the source here.

Image of the Week

Quote

Our series examining an Image of the Week from the photographic files, by Kevin Warstadt, Edward Connery Lathem ’51 Digital Library Fellow.

Setter ca. 1943

Pictured above is a photo from a folder labeled Dogs 1. On the back of the photo, a note reads “Dore Kendall’s Setter [1943?] name forgotten.” It was this note that caused the photo jump out to me. It strikes me as a strange thing to see a photo of a dog in this portrait style. Obviously, the dog had no conception of photography. It was positioned and captured in time for the sake of its owners. Now its owners are gone and the dog’s name is forgotten, yet its photo remains like a fossilized footprint. In his essay “Why Look at Animals,” John Berger writes on the relationship between owner and pet.

The pet completes him, offering responses to aspects of his character which would otherwise remain unconfirmed. He can be to his pet what he is not to anybody or anything else. Furthermore, the pet can be conditioned to react as though it, too, recognizes this. The pet offers its owner a mirror to a part that is otherwise never reflected. But, since in this relationship the autonomy of both parties has been lost (the owner has become the-special-man-he-is-only-to-his-pet, and the animal has become dependent on its owner for every physical need), the parallelism of their separate lives has been destroyed.

further

…animals are always the observed. The fact that they can observe us has lost all significance. They are the objects of our ever-extending knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and thus an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the further away they are.

The dog here exists outside of the context of its relationship to its owner, yet at the same time within it, as the existence of the photo necessitates this context. The dog has entered into a limbo state, in which it retains an aspect of the identity assigned to it (as Dore Kendall’s setter) but has lost a part of it as well (it’s name). Because the dog could produce no works, this photo is its only means to remain beyond the bounds of life. Is it cruel that this creature should be forced to exist in this state, not remembered yet not forgotten? No, I think, as no harm is done. But it is uncanny to look upon a physical object that so immediately captures the fleeting nature of life and identity.

See more photos of dogs here.