Marriage and Parenting
![164-42-15525_002_2](https://sites.dartmouth.edu/vsfd16/files/2020/11/164-42-15525_002_2.jpg)
Wedding Basket
Yucca, dye and grass
16 1/8 in.
Museum Purchase
164.42.15525
![PH-991-46_001_2](https://sites.dartmouth.edu/vsfd16/files/2020/11/PH-991-46_001_2.jpg)
Untitled (Make-up with Daughter)
From Kitchen Table Series
Gelatin silver print
29 × 29 in.
Purchased through through the Harry Shafer Fisher 1966 Memorial Fund
PH.991.46
Often, marriage marks the first step toward building a family. Welcoming a new life takes you across another important threshold. You become a parent and, in many cultures, are immediately responsible for a life other than your own. But the actual act of giving birth may require some help. Henry W. Bannarn’s Midwife (Breath of Life) (about 1940) sculpture depicts a midwife embracing a newborn, slapping its back to ensure the child takes its first breath. This wood sculpture recognizes the frequently overlooked role that midwives—especially Black midwives—play during birth. In spite of the physical and psychological assurance that these Black women have historically offered during (and leading up to) childbirth, why has their critical role been so thoroughly ignored? In her paper, Birthing, Blackness, and the Body: Black Midwives and Experiential Continuities of Institutional Racism, Keisha La’Nesha Goode attributes the denigration of Black midwives to the medicalization of childbirth and America’s history of institutional racism, writing:
“The [early 20th century] discourse of sanitary science and germ theory of disease positioned midwives—distanced from the credentialed legitimacy of physicians and the perceived precision of modern scientific knowledge and application—in a very vulnerable position. Physicians and hospitals became definitive symbols of safety, sanitation and cleanliness. The conventional thought regarding the ignorance, incompetence, unsafety and uncleanliness of midwives of the time cannot be disassociated from race, and specifically for my purposes, blackness.” §
Bannarn’s midwife exhibits none of these qualities. Rather, she appears stern and concentrated, with her brow furrowed and shoulders arched. She concentrates on achieving two primary tasks: simultaneously protect the mother and protect the child. Midwives bear witness to this rite of passage more than anyone else. With this sculpture, Bannarn celebrates the poise, strength, and composure of Black midwives and gives them the recognition that they deserve.
As babies and infants grow older, they learn to mimic their parents. This goes for many animals, not just humans. They begin by mirroring gestures and mumbling familiar sounds. When they’re old enough, they learn more complex skills, like walking and talking. Before long, young children are exposed to our entrenched gender constructs, whether they recognize it or not. One such example is applying make-up. Carrie Mae Weems captures such a scene in her photograph Untitled (Make-Up with Daughter) (1990). Weems has situated herself at the head of a bare table in a kitchen that is stripped of all decor. Her daughter sits beside her and applies lipstick, mirroring Weems. Although it is unlikely that Weems’s young daughter has introduced lipstick to her daily routine, she is still familiarizing herself with it and learning to associate this activity with her mother and womanhood, more generally. This is just as much of a rite of passage for Weems. She must confront the reality that her child is growing up, as her daughter begins to play with this highly gendered activity. No words are exchanged: mother shows daughter, daughter learns from mother. The make-up itself is not the photograph’s focal point; the pair is simply sharing a tender moment and has given us a privileged look at a day in the life of the Weems household.
§ (Goode 53)
For millennia, getting married has been a significant moment. Whether the marriage is consecrated with the sharing of vows, presenting a dowry, or even signing legal documents, a couple’s lexicon drops “me” in favor of “us.” In contemporary American culture, marriage is most often presented as a union between two people who love each other. It may also represent a socially sanctioned method for consolidating of wealth or power among families and for welcoming children into the world. It is a rite that concerns many people, never just the bride and the groom, which may explain the splendid formality that often accompanies weddings across many cultures. Agnes Kewanwytewa and Dmitri Baltermants grew up in vastly different cultural contexts, but both artists have explored the marital tradition in their work. Kewanwytewa was born into the Hopi tribe and raised on a reservation in northern Arizona. The expert weaver made Wedding Basket (1963) for her son’s marriage, in an unusual subversion of established Hopi marital traditions. Typically, the groom’s family finances the wedding gown, and the bride’s family weaves baskets as repayment for the investment. The baskets are durable, meant to weather tough conditions. Every strand of dyed yucca fiber is wound tightly together. Like every traditional Hopi wedding basket, Agnes Kewanwytewa’s exemplary weave is meant to encourage fortitude, as though it were a physical manifestation of a resilient marriage.
Only a few years prior, as Dmitri Baltermants was traveling across China, photographing locals and documenting their everyday goings-on, he captured a Chinese couple formalizing their marriage with a wholly different ritual. A Bride and Groom Register for Marriage, China (about 1955–58) shows a couple inspecting a sheet of paper. When he captured this photograph, Baltermants was a photojournalist working for the Soviet magazine Ogonyok. Baltermants’s work tended to celebrate the Soviet Union, projecting strength and economic success. While there is little overt political imagery in this photograph, Baltermants’s photography should not always be accepted at face value. One takeaway might be that regardless of mutual affection, exuberant celebrations, or formalized dowries, in the USSR, no marriage could be ratified without enduring the legal mechanisms that supposedly validated it. In the Soviet Union, the state was just as important as any other stakeholders in a marriage (e.g., the couple, their parents, the church). Given that the USSR was focused on growth and output, it is only natural that they sought to play a significant role in structuring domestic life.
![ph-2003-56-181_001-17_cr_2](https://sites.dartmouth.edu/vsfd16/files/2020/11/ph-2003-56-181_001-17_cr_2.jpg)
A bride and groom register for marriage, China
Gelatin silver print
11 × 14 in.
Purchased through a gift from Harley and Stephen C. Osman, Class of 1956, Tuck 1957
PH.2003.56.181
![2006-31_001_2](https://sites.dartmouth.edu/vsfd16/files/2020/11/2006-31_001_2.jpg)
Midwife (Breath of Life)
Mahogany or walnut
16 3/4 × 8 3/16 × 5 in.
Purchased through the Katharine T. and Merrill G. Beede 1929 Fund and the Florence and Lansing Porter Moore 1937 Fund
2006.31