Opinion > Editorials (/Opinion/Editorials!)

Editorial: Unfair Criticism of College Students

 Friday, April 21,2017

A little more than a century ago, photographer Lewis Hine took haunting images of children toiling at the huge Amoskeag Mill in Manchester. No one would have asked if they were growing up too slowly. But that’s the question of the day in 2017,when it’s being asked about college students.

Are they staying. as Bob Dylan once urged, “forever young?’

Recently a conference at Dartmouth College took up the issue, though it seems many observers have already made up their minds. College students in general have been mocked of late for immature and occasionally violent attacks on free speech – although critics should be careful about slandering a generation for a few incidents. Likewise, the critics decry calls among some for “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces,” which we note often come from minorities who feel they are surrounded by a hostile culture. Are they entirely wrong in that?

Conference organizer James Bernard Murphy, a professor of government at Dartmouth, said that by many standards, young people of today are less mature. They are marrying about six years later than young people did in 1960,for one measure.

Psychology professor Jean M. Twenge from San Diego State placed part of the blame for “juvenilization” on the self-esteem movement, which reached such extremes that some elementary teachers were wary of correcting mistakes lest they hurt feelings, and young athletes received “participation” trophies.

Joe Asch, a Dartmouth alum and a sponsor of the conference, was blunt in his assessment: “Students seem to feel they should be taken care of,and if they have worries and anxieties it’s up to the college to help them out.”

Still, Jeffrey Jensen Arnett,a research professor in psychology from Clark University, came to Dartmouth to defend millennials. He denied that they are lazy, overindulged narcissists: “It’s absolutely contradictory to what I’ve found in 25 years of ongoing research and reading other people’s research.”

It’s not easy to determine the accuracy of generalizations about the students of today, but judging by the actual students we encounter, there is cause to reserve judgment. We’re not persuaded young people are coddled and carefree in all matters.

For one thing, school has become a high-stakes competition for those who feel pressured to apply to the best colleges against long odds, which can be beaten only by near-perfect grades and spectacular extracurricular activities – such as creating nonprofits that eradicate exotic diseases, or hiking to the South Pole.

It cannot escape young people’s attention that recent college graduates are taking on a lot of debt

– New Hampshire is widely reported to lead the nation, with an average topping $36,000 in 2015

-and that job prospects have been uncertain since the Great Recession.

Does the charge of immaturity apply to community college students, or state university students who take semesters off to earn money for tuition, or do they best apply to certain schools that cater mostly to a privileged,wealthier demographic? Is the discussion of maturity mostly in itself an elite exercise?

It’s quite possible that the pressures of early adulthood aren’t really gone -they’re just different. Older adults might have to talk to an actual college student to learn all about them.

News > Education (/News/Education/)
Dartmouth Conference Asks Whether Colleges Keep Students Young

By Jaimie Seaton For the Valley News
Monday, April 10, 2017

Are we delaying maturation on college campuses?

That was the central question posed at a conference hosted by Dartmouth College on Saturday. The free and public event was organized by James Bernard Murphy,professor of government and faculty director of the Daniel Webster Project at Dartmouth,partly in response to recent controversies on college campuses around freedom of speech issues.
“Several things converged that led me to convene the conference,” Murphy said the day before the conference. “I’m writing a book on human development that looks at ways we divide human life into
stages; and in the course of my research I began looking at models of human development.”
One of those models is neoteny, a term that comes from two Greek words meaning “prolonged youthfulness.” Human beings have the longest period of gestation,childhood and sexual immaturity
of any species. From an evolutionary perspective, Murphy said, one of the benefits of this prolonged childhood is the potential for learning;and he likened the developmental delay to an
ancient truism about archery: the more we pull the arrow backward, the farther it can go forward. On the sociological side, over the past 50 years, the markers of adulthood, such as marriage, jobs
and having children are being attained at ever-older ages, Murphy said. In 1960, the median age for marriage for a man was 22.8 and for a woman was 20.3; in 2010 it was 29.2 and 26.1, respectively,
according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

In his proposal for the conference, Murphy wrote that by many measures, young people today are much more immature than in even the recent past. He added that we are conflicted about our children: on the one hand we want to prepare them for adulthood and on the other hand we want to protect them from it.
“A lot of the controversies we are now having about college life – the rape crisis, speech codes and political correctness – are fundamentally rooted in an ambivalence about whether college
students are children or adults,” Murphy said. “Alcohol policies are a great example of this: Do you treat students as adults, who if they violate the drinking laws get the full force of the law; or
do you try to deal with it through internal procedures, which prevents them from feeling the full
effects of the law?”

He added that the disagreements and controversies are predicated on assumptions about whether students are children or adults, and the conference sought to facilitate discussion on that point.
Jeffrey Jensen Arnett,research professor in the psychology department at Clark University, in Worcester, Mass., gave the keynote address, titled “Will The Millennials Ever Grow Up?”
“I’m happy to tell you the answer is yes,” began Arnett. “People were asking the same question 25 years ago about Generation X and they did grow up, they just grew up later than before, and the
same thing is true now. All the trends that had begun at that time have become more prominent.”
Arnett,author of Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Roadfrom the Late Teens Through the Twenties, argued that the stereotypes about millennials being selfish,lazy, indulged narcissists are not only
untrue, but may represent the last respectable prejudice.
“I have inadvertently become their defender,” Arnett said. “Iam a social scientist first and foremost and if Ifelt like I had evidence they are all those nasty things people say they are, I would tell you. It’s absolutely contradictory to what I’ve found in 25 years of doing research and reading other people’s research.”
In the Q&A following the keynote, Joe Asch, a Dartmouth alum and a sponsor of the conference, pushed back against Arnett’s presentation, saying we ask very little of millennials, that we tiptoe
around them, and that we should stop spoiling them.
“Students seem to feel that they should be taken care of, and if they have worries and anxieties it’s up to the college to help them out, as if they are in a childcare center and a provider has to come running,” said Asch, who is the owner of the River Valley Club.
In her presentation, “Juvenilization and Self-Esteem at Schools: Are we prolonging childhood by our attempt to promote self-esteem in school?,”Jean M. Twenge, professor of psychology at San Diego
State University, argued that the emphasis on preserving self-esteem gives children an inflated view of their abilities.
“How it works now is if you just show up, and even in some cases if you don’t show up,they give you a trophy; if you sit on the fence you get a trophy; if you suck you still get a trophy. Everyone’s
trophy is the same size no matter who wins or loses, or they don’t keep score. Then there’s this idea in some elementary school classes that you should not correct mistakes because it could harm
their self-esteem. Early on, there’s this idea that we need to boost self esteem and boost self confidence.”
Twenge, author of Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable Than Ever Before, presented research showing that in the U.S., the
group with the lowest self-esteem is Asian-Americans, who have the best academic performance.
“It does really belie the idea that self-confidence is the key to success. Clearly it’s not,” Twenge said, adding that self-esteem can cause problems if it’s not based in reality. The final presentation, “Speech Codes on Campus: How do campus restrictions on speech prolong juvenility among students?,” was given by Kenan Malik, a lecturer and broadcaster based in London.

Malik, author of The Quest/or a Moral Compass, made a strong argument against the emergence of “safe spaces” and “trigger warnings,” saying that free speech is often discussed in a narcissistic
manner.”Free speech from this perspective,requires not a robust exchange of ideas, but the validation of my views. I should have the right to tick off anyone that I wish ,but criticism of my views is seen in a sense as a denial of my free speech.”
Malik’s presentation generated an articulate rebuttal from Dartmouth senior Chileta Dim, who argued that safe spaces for debate preserve time and energy for action.She and Malik had a thoughtful, nuanced debate on the question,with other attendees interjecting alternate views. Speaking after the conference, Asch said, “Anytime you can get some acknowledged experts together to
discuss the world around you it’s got to be fascinating.Today’s students seem to be a different type, they have different motivations and different concerns from 10-15 years ago, and it’s
interesting to try and understand that.”
Jaimie Seaton is a freelance writer based in Hanover. Her work appears in the Washington Post, The Guardianand numerous other publications.

Emily Yoffe is a Slate contributor who has written the magazine’s Dear Prudence advice column since 2006. She also writes for Slate about culture, health, politics, and science. Emily’s writing  has appeared in many publications, including Esquire, The Los Angeles Times, the New Republic, the New York Times, O  the Oprah Magazine, and The Washington Post. She is the author of the book What the Dog Did: Tales from a Formerly Reluctant Dog Owner. She was a National Magazine Award finalist this year for her Slate story, “The College Rape Overcorrection.” She was a John S. Knight Journalism Fellow at Stanford University. She is a graduate of Wellesley College.

Valley News Article

Published on the Valley News (http://www.vnews.com)

Editorial: At Dartmouth, Talking About Sexual Assault

Wednesday, October 14, 2015
(Published in print: Wednesday, October 14, 2015)

Writer Emily Yoffe, best known for her “Dear Prudence” advice column in Slate, was on the Dartmouth campus the other day to offer guidance on a difficult subject — sexual assault at colleges and universities. The information wasn’t what some wanted to hear.

Victims of sexual assault and their advocates, including a group of placard-carrying students who staged a pointed but respectful protest during Yoffe’s remarks last Thursday, reject her argument that policies adopted by colleges to protect victims have gone too far.

The argument started last December, when Slate published Yoffe’s 12,000-word article, “The Campus Rape Overcorrection.” The headline was unfortunate, in that Yoffe does not deny that sexual assault is a serious problem too long dismissed by colleges and universities. She asserts, however, that higher education institutions, under federal pressure to prevent sexual violence and punish offenders, often abrogate the civil rights of those accused of sexual assault, denying them justice.

Moreover, Yoffe dares to challenge common assumptions, including that rape is alarmingly prevalent on U.S. campuses. She also wonders whether policies requiring women to consent to every step of a sexual encounter, like the one adopted by Dartmouth, were formulated by people who’ve ever had sex.

These are fighting words to feminists and others who regard the “affirmative consent” standard — “yes means yes” — as empowering, a safeguard against unwanted sexual advances.

Whatever your perspective on sexual politics, Yoffe makes some valid points. First, she is skeptical of the methodology behind surveys that suggest sexual assault is an “epidemic” on U.S. campuses. For example, an oft-cited survey commissioned in 2000 by the U.S. Department of Justice, and the basis of President Obama’s campaign to protect students against sexual violence, concluded that sexual assault affects as many as one in four undergraduates. But in a footnote the authors of that survey acknowledge making assumptions that increase the presumed risk. They warn that the one-in-four figure is merely “suggestive.” Other surveys are based on small sample sizes, which distort the numbers.

Sexual assault figures collected by colleges to comply with the federal Clery Act, which requires institutions to annually report crime data, suggest that the rate of sexual assault is lower than 25 percent. Reported assaults represent about 0.03 percent of the total 12 million female college student population, according to Clery data. Even accounting for the fact that sexual assault is a disturbingly underreported crime, it’s hard to square the Clery numbers with the one-in-four figure.

Statistics commonly cited by the media imply that “American college women are raped at a rate similar to women in Congo, where rape has been used as a weapon of war,” Yoffe writes.

Second, the debate over what to do about “sexual assault” is muddled by the fact that the term can in some contexts mean anything from forcible rape to unwanted touching. This is not to dismiss any aspect of sexual harassment or violence against women. It’s to suggest that the problem itself isn’t adequately defined, and that some data on sexual assault reflect blurred distinctions.

It’s too bad that Yoffe has been accused of insensitivity, of attacking victims and women generally. We commend Yoffe for challenging the facts and standing up for the rights of the accused. That doesn’t take away from the seriousness of sexual assault, which colleges and universities must continue to combat forcefully but fairly.

Source URL:http://www.vnews.com/opinion/19006586-95/talking-aboutsexual-assault